澳洲阿德莱德代写assignment:教学实践

2018-08-16 18:48

很明显，从一开始，作者就坚信IWBs在孩子的学习中扮演着重要的角色，并且在今天的教学实践中，IWB是一个重要的资源。他们在假设中提出的建议加强了他们的论点。作者还指出，在孩子的学习过程中，IWB在保持孩子参与的过程中起着关键作用。然而，这是研究的第一点，因为作者没有意识到有许多不同的因素和方法可以影响孩子对学习的投入和参与。一些不同的例子的其他因素会影响一个孩子的参与他们的学习中可以看到“有效教学的四个Ace - Ace 3:订婚提到的一个方法是,班主任应该讨论限制在不超过30分钟之前引入一个学习活动。这种学习活动不需要使用IWB;通过这篇研究论文，Warwick, Hennessy和Mercer对IWB以及教师使用的方式进行了大量的宣传。然而，有研究表明，只有当教师掌握了特定的技术技能，比如使用IWB，他们才被认为是“有能力的”。范德比尔特大学(Vanderbilt)的认知与科技集团(Cognition and Technology Group)在1992年发表了一篇文章，其中一个例子是，科技是教师的解放者，帮助重新确立课堂教师的角色和价值。教师必须与技术建立合作或伙伴关系，以创建一个培养、鼓励和参与学习过程的“社区”。然而，Warwick, Hennessy和Mercer(2011)对此提出了质疑，他们指出，事实上，在激发对话方法方面，课堂教师才是关键，而不是IWB。然而，他们确实指出，IWB在课堂上确实发挥了重要作用，但只有当它在课堂上以一种吸引人的、合适的方式使用时，这才是正确的。
澳洲阿德莱德代写assignment:教学实践
It is obvious from the start that the authors firmly believe that IWBs play a major part in a children's learning and that an IWB is a crucial resource when it comes to teaching practices today. Their argument is reinforced by their suggestions in the hypothesis. The authors also state that an IWB plays a key part in maintaining a child's engagement during their learning. However this is the first point of the research where the authors can be criticised for not recognising that there are a number of different factors and methods that can influence a child's commitment and engagement to learning. Some different examples of other factors that can have an influence on a child's engagement with their learning can be seen in the 'Four aces of effective teaching - Ace 3: Engagement One method mentioned is that a class teacher should 'limit a discussion to no more than 30 minutes before introducing a learning activity. This learning activity doesn't need to be one using an IWB; it can be done on paper etc.All the way through this research paper Warwick, Hennessy and Mercer make numerous claims about IWB and the way teachers use them. However, there are studies that have shown that teachers have only been considered 'capable 'when they have grasped specific technological skills, such as using an IWB. An example of an article that states this is one conducted by the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992), they state that 'technology is a teacher's liberator to help re-establish the role and value of the classroom teacher. Teachers must enter into collaboration or partnership with technology in order to create a "community" that nurtures, encourages, and engages the learning processes'. Nevertheless, Warwick, Hennessy and Mercer (2011) dispute this by stating that it is in fact the classroom teacher that is vital in stimulating dialogic approach not the IWB. However they do state that the IWB does have an important role in the classroom, but this is only correct when it is used in an engaging and suitable manner in the classroom.

• 上一篇：阿德莱德代写assignment:传统的做法
• 下一篇：澳洲阿德莱德代写assignment:特别重要的作用