澳洲阿德莱德代写作业:澳大利亚历史地理

2019-02-08 14:10

正是在这种背景下，我们可以确定爱尔兰和澳大利亚历史地理的主要相似性。如果在这种情况下，我们打算将“殖民者”定义为“我们”。对于这两个国家，我们触及了一个关键的问题领域。爱尔兰和澳大利亚都被排除在后殖民对话之外，尽管它们不可否认是后殖民国家。然而，在后殖民主义的对话中讨论这两个国家将忽略这样一个事实，即它们都是相对富裕的国家，都是第一世界的成员，同该领域中普遍讨论的国家没有什么相似之处。然而，在“其他”的框架下，它们确实有许多相似之处，主要是因为它们都是欧洲中心观点的外围(Litvack, 2006: 2)——尽管这一点，至少在经济上，对爱尔兰来说越来越不真实。麦金太尔(1999:24)写了关于澳大利亚的文章。东方逐渐代表了一种低于西方的生活方式:懒惰、非理性、专制、腐朽。评论家爱德华(Edward)说，这种对外星人和其他外星人的类型化，被称为东方主义，在地理与历史相矛盾的殖民时期的澳大利亚，有着特殊的意义。在殖民者对他们与大都会之间地带的理解中，混杂着迷惑和恐惧。作为英国的附属国，澳大利亚采用了近东、中东和远东的术语，直到1940年，在日本入侵的威胁下，澳大利亚首相突然意识到“大不列颠所谓的远东对我们来说就是近北”。
澳洲阿德莱德代写作业:澳大利亚历史地理
It is in this context that we can identify the primary similarity between the historical geographies of Ireland and Australia. If within this context we are meant to define the ‘colonisers’ as ‘us’ (i.e., those involved in Western geographical discourse) and the ‘colonised’ as ‘them’ or ‘other’, we reach a crucial problematic area with regards to the two nations at hand. Ireland and Australia are both nations left out of the post-colonial dialogue even though they are undeniably post-colonial. However, discussing these two nations within the dialogue of post-colonialism would ignore the fact that they are both relatively wealthy nations, members of the First World, with few similarities to the nations that are generally being discussed within the sphere. Yet, within the framework of ‘other’, they do share many similarities mainly because they are both peripheral from a Euro-centric viewpoint (Litvack, 2006: 2) – though this, economically at least, is increasingly untrue concerning Ireland. Macintyre (1999: 24) writes with regard to Australia.The Orient came to stand for a whole way of life that was inferior to that of the West: indolent, irrational, despotic, and decayed. Such typification of the alien and other, which the critic Edward Said characterizes as Orientalism, had a peculiar meaning in colonial Australia where geography contradicted history. Fascination and fear mingled in the colonists’ apprehension of the zone that lay between them and the metropole. As a British dependency, Australia adopted the terminology that referred to the Near, Middle and Far East until, under threat of Japanese invasion in 1940, its prime minister suddenly recognized that “What Great Britain call the Far East is to us the Near North”.