ASSIGNMENT代写

南澳阿德莱德哲学作业代写:死刑

2019-12-11 20:46

死刑最有力的论据之一是基于犯罪威慑的概念。威慑理论是基于这样一种理解:如果犯罪的后果大于好处,罪犯就会受到威慑。研究人员声称,人类基本上意识到了对与错的区别,因此犯罪是一种自由选择,包括基于行为后果的选择。因此,赞成者认为死刑是对打算犯死罪的罪犯的有效威慑。这些分析人士认为,死刑在受到严厉惩罚的潜在罪犯心中造成恐惧,而另一种观点则是基于这样一种理解,即死刑可以消除社会上的恶棍和惯犯,否则他们会继续骚扰人们。支持者认为罪犯被处死后不再构成任何威胁。这遵循了一个逻辑论点,即处决杀手和其他激进罪犯将有助于社会更安全,班纳(2002年,第60页),第三个死刑论据是基于成本影响。死刑的支持者认为,将罪犯限制在监狱和康复中心涉及纳税人的钱的支出。与公共资金的巨大支出和释放这些人给社会带来的普遍影响相比,死刑的代价微不足道。有观点认为,被释放的罪犯可能会导致社会恐慌和恐惧,或者招募其他罪犯,但就成本而言,这未必是可以量化的,大卫(2006年,第50页)。因此,支持者认为,从各方面考虑,对杀手的死刑比其他刑罚的代价要低。
南澳阿德莱德哲学作业代写:死刑
One of the strongest arguments for the death penalty is based on the concept of deterrence of crime. The deterrence theory is based on the understanding that criminals are deterred if the consequences of a crime outweigh the benefits. Researchers claim that humans are basically aware of the differences between rights and wrong and as such the commission of crime is a free choice involving choices based on consequences of actions. As such, the proponents argue that death penalty is an effective deterrence to criminals contemplating committing a capital offense. These analysts argue hat the death penalty creates fear in the mind of potential offenders given the harsh punishment.The other argument for death penalty is based on the understanding hat it eliminates villains and habitual killers from the society who would otherwise continue to harass people. The proponents argue hat when a criminal is executed he no longer poses any threat. This follows the logical argument that the execution of killers and other radical offenders would contribute to safer societies, Banner (2002, p.60).The third argument for the death punishment is based on the cost implications. The proponents of the death penalty argue that confining criminals to prisons and rehabilitation centers involves expenditure of taxpayer’s money. The costs of death penalty are paltry compared with the enormous expenditure of public funds and the general impact of release of such people to the societies. There are arguments that the criminals released may lead to panic and fear in the society or the recruitment of other criminals which may not be necessarily quantifiable in terms of costs, David (2006, p.50). As such, the proponents argue that the death penalty for killers is less costly than other punishments by all considerations.