堪培拉代写Assignment 身体吸引力

2016-12-17 10:55


研究数据进行了进一步的分析,超越假设关系,以提供潜在的更具体的上下文解释的研究结果,以及注意进一步的限制和贡献的研究,向潜在的富有成果的未来研究提供见解。开始,也许令人惊讶的是,这项研究发现两个条件之间的高度没有显着差异。然而,也许不太令人惊讶的是,在这种情况下,统计上的差异是存在于重量的变量,两组之间。前者更令人惊讶,因为更大的高度和较低的重量导致在较低的,并在这方面更社会可取的,BMI。因此,缺乏差异的发现,当比较报告的高度,群体之间,似乎与社会期望偏差预测不一致。支持这一观点,此前的研究表明,较高的人(男性5 9”5会”)被认为是社会的吸引力比短的(男性在5年”)除非人异常高大(男性身高6以上2”)(格拉齐亚诺,brothen,&波谢德,1978)。凯斯(1980,在菜鸟,2006引)补充说,较高的男性和女性是积极的判断与。凯斯(1980,作为菜鸟,2006引)指出,高个子男人被认为更英俊,健壮,而较短的男性被认为是苍白的,乏味的。同样,个子高的女性更是与诸如轻盈柔软的描述,而较短的女性被描述为疯狂的。

堪培拉代写Assignment 身体吸引力

In prior research, fewer studies exploring how body attraction can be perceived to affect interpersonal interactions, as compared with the increasing research on individuals’ perceptions of facial attractiveness. In exploring the effects of potential physical attraction on interpersonal interactions, this study collected and analyzed two personal factors–height and weight – in the form of BMI ratio.  That participants in the BPL condition reported lower BMIs than those in the control condition, it can be assumed that participants were as aware of the potential influence of BMI in perceptions of physical attractiveness.  A more desirable BMI (e.g., in the present context, lower BMIs are desirable) was imagined to improve one’s level of physical attractiveness in managing one’s impression on others
Study data were further analyzed, beyond the hypothesized relationship, in order to offer potential more specific contextual explanations for the findings, as well as to note further limitations and contributions of the study, toward offering insights into potentially fruitful future research. To begin, perhaps surprisingly, this study found no significant difference in reported height between the two conditions.  However, perhaps less surprisingly, in this context, a statistical difference is present on the variable of weight, between the two groups.  The former is more surprising, given that greater height and lower weight results in a lower, and in this context more socially desirable, BMI.  As such, the lack of difference found, when comparing reported heights, between the groups, seems inconsistent with social desirability bias prediction.  To support that notion, prior research has shown that taller individuals (males of 5’9’’-5’11’’) are considered more socially attractive than shorter ones (males under 5’7’’) unless the person is unusually lofty (males who are taller than 6’2’’) (Graziano, Brothen, & Berscheid, 1978).  Keyes (1980, cited in Patzer, 2006) adds that both taller males and females are linked with positive judgments. Keyes (1980, as cited in Patzer, 2006) notes that taller men are perceived as more handsome and athletic, while shorter men are seen as pallid and bland.  Similarly, taller women have shown to be described with words such as lithe and supple, while shorter females are depicted as frenetic.