ASSIGNMENT代写

堪培拉代写assignment:自然法则的执行者

2019-01-30 22:14

另一方面,洛克描绘了一幅平静自然状态的照片,认为“自然状态的自然规律来管理它,生活€¦教所有mankinda€¦人人平等和独立的,没有人应该伤害另一个在他的生活中,健康、自由或财产”(洛克9)。洛克攻击霍布斯的自然状态的描述性分析是特别的,因为它从未发生。洛克进一步说,他对自然状态的概念是历史性的,伟大的社会是以他的理论所描述的方式开始的。他引用“罗马和威尼斯的开始是由几个自由和独立的人联合起来的,他们之间没有自然的优越或服从”(洛克54)。这是因为洛克认为,这种道德自然一直灌输给人类的“无限智慧makera€¦分享大自然的一个社区,不应该有任何这样的从属”(洛克9)。不同于霍布斯,他认为没有道德框架惩罚在自然状态中,洛克认为“违背自然的法则”是指一个“宣称,他对生活的另一个规则比理性和普通股权益,这就是上帝为人类行为设定的标准”(洛克10)。洛克认为“每个人都有权利惩罚罪犯,在上帝面前成为自然法则的执行者”。
堪培拉代写assignment:自然法则的执行者
On the other hand, Locke paints a calmer picture of the state of nature, arguing that “the state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which…teaches all mankind…that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions” (Locke 9). Locke attack on Hobbes’s descriptive analysis of the state of nature is particularly damning because it has never occurred. Locke furthers that his notion of the state of nature is historical, that great societies began in the way that his theory described. He cites that the “beginning of Rome and Venice were by the uniting of several free and independent of one another, amongst whom there was no natural superiority or subjection” (Locke 54). This is because Locke believes that this moral nature has been instilled in humanity by an “infinitely wise maker…sharing all in one community of nature, there cannot be supposed any such subordination” (Locke 9). Unlike Hobbes, who believes there is no ethical frame for punishment during the state of nature, Locke argues that “transgressing the law of nature” means one “declares himself to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity, which is that measure God has set to the actions of men” (Locke 10). Locke believes that “every man hath a right to punish the offender, and be executioner of the law of nature” to criminals in the face of God.