ASSIGNMENT代写

History Assignment代写:地位与性别

2017-02-12 01:03

然而,到什么程度,我们可以将昆斯所面临的性别困境?虽然女王的地位因性别差异并没有阻止成功的统治。国王也面临困难,他们的统治,亨利七世并不完全是由国家或教会,例如自己离婚的拒绝和作为一个结果造成多部他在位期间的行为。每个都铎君主有问题在他们的统治者,他们必须克服时间,和有些人可能认为,他们的人格是一个因素,他们的性别。昆斯和Kings是君主至上的两个机构的想法有助于解释的神圣权利,继承了人体。因此,身体作为一个容器,上帝可以传播他的意志。 虽然有都铎王权与都铎女王之如的加冕——诉讼之间的连续性也有许多变化;如局举办的君主和权威,周围的人举行。然而,两者之间的关系是复杂的,“外在形式的连续性并不意味着解释或目的的连续性”[ 35 ]。虽然我们可以将法院诉讼,遗传系和加冕的例程,我们无法确定究竟这是通过舆论解读。对女王之判决是混合的,尽管有争议,它绝对是最不普遍谴责。对女王统治者性别限制的理论观点在付诸实践时并不严厉。虽然女性统治者是否被接受没有主导地位,但还是有“男性行使权力的偏好”[ 36 ]。关于问题“是都铎女王的地位从根本上从都铎王权”不同,答案也许是没有男性和女性君主仍然是相同的,但是最基本的方面,它是在履行职责面临富豪显示不同状态和接受的问题。一位女王面临着“与她不得不承担的女性脆弱性的斗争”[ 37 ]。正如国王必须达到他的性别预期一样,女王不得不积极地贬低自己的性别。

History Assignment代写:地位与性别

However, to what extent can we ascribe the difficulties faced by Queens to gender? Though Queenship suffered as a result of gender distinctions it did not prevent them from carrying out a successful reign. Kings too faced difficulty in their rule, Henry VII was not totally unquestioned by the state or the church, for example the refusal of his divorce and the actions taken as a result caused much division during his reign. Each Tudor monarch had problems within their time as ruler which they had to overcome, and some may argue that their personality is as much a factor as their gender. Queens and Kings were a Monarch foremost and the idea of two bodies helps explain the divine right that inherits a human body. The body, therefore, acts as a vessel for which God can spread his will.
While there were many continuities between Tudor Kingship and Tudor Queenship - such as the proceedings of the coronation - there were also many changes; such as the authority held by the Monarch and the authority held by those around them. However, the relationship between the two is complex and “continuity of the outward form does not imply continuity of interpretation or purpose”[35]. While we can objectify the court proceedings, the hereditary lines and the routines of coronation, we cannot be sure just how this was interpreted through public opinion. The verdict of Queenship was mixed, though there was controversy it was most definitely not universally condemned. The theoretical views of the gender restrictions for a Queen ruler were not as harsh when put into practice. While there is no dominant position on whether or not a female ruler was accepted, there was a “preference for male-exercised authority”[36]. With regards to the question “did Tudor Queenship differ fundamentally from Tudor Kingship”, the answer is perhaps no. The fundamental aspects of both male and female Monarch remained the same, however, it was the problems faced while carrying out their regal duties that showed the differing in status and of acceptance. A Queen was faced with the “struggle against feminine fragility which [she] had to undertake”[37]. Just as a King had to live up to his gender expectations, a Queen had to actively play down hers.
  • 上一篇:没有了
  • 下一篇:没有了