澳洲墨尔本代写assignment:智能控制

2018-11-20 10:21

其他哲学家约翰·奥斯丁的法律定义:“规则制定的指导一个智能的智能控制他。“有两种法律:积极的法律(规则由政治上级指挥他们的下级)和神圣法律.Law命令,奥斯汀认为的表达一个愿望的人有意愿和能力来执行遵从性。与托马斯·阿奎那,约翰·奥斯汀并不神圣和自然法则之间的差异。奥斯汀认为,上帝的命令对我们是真正的道德。奥斯汀区分神法/真正的从“积极的道德,道德信仰的对或错,只是/不公正所持有的多数人在某些社会。我们社会的积极道德是正确的,因为它同意对神法和错误的因为它偏离它。它没有任何价值,奥斯汀的非正统的观点神法的内容。奥斯丁认为,神命令我们效用最大化,使功利主义真正的道德。积极的法律是由“政治上级。“约翰·奥斯汀调用这些上级“主权”,他定义了“主权”的人或人不服从别人的习惯,和其他人是谁服从的习惯。积极的法律一般命令自己不受他们的人,谁能从其他人执行服从。我真的不符合这些哲学家的想法但是如果我应该倾向于他们的观点之一是约翰·奥斯丁的原因之一,他的法律部门。
澳洲墨尔本代写assignment:智能控制
Other Philosopher John Austin has definition of law as followed: a “rule laid down for the guidance of an intelligent being by an intelligent being having power over him.” There are two kinds of law: positive law (rules commanded by political superiors to their inferiors) and divine law .Law is commands, which Austin see as an expression of a wish by someone who has the willingness and ability to enforce compliance. Unlike Thomas Aquinas, John Austin does not make any differences between divine and natural law. Austin thinks that God’s commands to us are the true morality. Austin distinguishes divine law/the true morality from “positive morality,” or the beliefs about what’s right/wrong, just/unjust that are held by the majority of people in some society. The positive morality of our society is right as it agree with divine law and incorrect insofar as it deviates from it. It does not have any value that Austin had an unorthodox view of the content of divine law. Austin believed that God commands us to be utility maximizes, making utilitarianism the true morality.Positive laws are driven by “political superiors.” John Austin calls these superiors the “sovereign,” and he defines “sovereign” as the person or persons who are not in the habit of obeying anyone else, and who everyone else is in the habit of obeying. Positive laws are general commands by people who themselves are not bound by them, and who can enforce obedience from everyone else. I don’t really match with either of these philosophers ideas but if I should to tend to one of their views it would be the one of John Austin’s for a reason of his division of laws.